Impulse Gamer Home



   PlayStation 3
   XBox 360
   PC
   Wii
   3DS
   DS
   PSP
   Apple
   Casual
   Android
   Classics


   Movies & IMAX
   Blu-ray
   Action
   Anime
   Comedy
   Crime & Thrillers
   Documentaries
   Drama
   Family
   Horror
   Kids
   Lifestyle
   Music
   Romance
   Sci-fi
   Sport


   PC
   Apple
   Hardware


   News
   Interviews
   Articles


   Tara's G-Spot
   Comics
   Books
   Mind & Body
   Music
   Competitions
   Community

ad
whatshot Lady Chatterley's Lover (1981) DVD Review - www.impulsegamer.com -

Feature 8.5
Video 8.0
Audio 7.0
Special Features   0.0
Total 7.3
Running Time: TBA
Classification:
 M15+
Reviewer:
Felix Staica

7.3


Lady Chatterley's Lover (1981)

Directed and written by Just Jaeckin and largely dismissed by reviewers at www.imdb.com, this adaptation of the classic D H Lawrence novel provides a very useful illustration of some of the concerns of the book. 

Lady Constance Chatterley ‘Connie’ (Sylvia Kristel) is an aristocrat who marries a young upper class man Sir Clifford Chatterley ‘Cliff’ (Shane Briant). However, the War intervenes and he comes back an impotent paraplegic. The young couple’s ante-bellic amorousness is replaced by a sterile co-existence.
Cliff realises that Connie’s ‘feminine needs’ cannot go unmet and so invites her to find a lover, even perhaps one who will one day produce an heir for the Chatterley line, so that the line may continue. However, the one man she chooses is Oliver Mellors (Nicholas Clay), the gardener and game-keeper. Connie and Mellors make minutes of filmic lover right before our eyes. 

Lawrence, Mellors and Clifford are so utterly obsessed by class, status and iniquities that it leads to a tragic spiral… or so you’d think…. Add to this a manipulative menopausal widow/nurse who so positions herself as to end up with the estate her hard labour would never have delivered her. 

While this is surely a case of ‘the book is better than the film’, it does not warrant discarding the Jaeckin production wholesale. There is merit perhaps in reading the book and then seeing one interpretation. Or seeing the movie and then reading its source. I find either way helps to furnish some sense of period to the narrative. The transfer from the film is not as crisp as we have come to expect this day and age, but it that’s only a minor inconvenience. The attempts at sensuality and symbolism come off a bit awkward. 

Felix Staica


 

Share this page

All content is TM and (c) copyright www.impulsegamer.com and may not be reproduced without permission. All other imagery, text etc is the property of its respective owner and is used with permission.


ad