Gone
		
		
		
		A waitress named Jill (Amanda Seyfried) 
		lives with her sister Molly (Emily Wickersham). Jill regularly jogs 
		through the woods searching for a particular spot because she is 
		convinced that she was once kidnapped by a man and left in a hole in the 
		ground. She believes that she was one of the lucky ones to escape. None 
		of the police believe her and insist that she is simply paranoid. 
		
		When 
		Molly goes missing before her exam, when she is meant to be studying, 
		Jill believes that the same man who kidnapped her came into their house 
		and took her sister instead. Jill checks in with Molly's boyfriend but 
		he hasn't seen her and the police aren't any help either as they believe 
		she is lying again. Jill travels across town looking for clues but when 
		she pulls a gun on someone to interrogate them the police put a search 
		out on her.
		
		Gone, a very minor thriller by director Heitor Dhalia, is unfortunately 
		one of those movies. If I could compare Gone to one movie it would be 
		Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011), as both films deal with the possibility 
		of trauma existing strictly as a result of imagination rather than 
		authentic memory. Don't mistaken this for high praise though as this is 
		lacking the same level of formal sophistication and subtlety.
		
		
		Aside 
		from some scarce flashbacks, the paranoia is not represented with any 
		creative visual flair. Gone is photographed with drab, washed out tones 
		that are inexpressive of the film's themes or the contrast between 
		fiction and reality. Instead, we're served up thick slices of exposition 
		between two cops, neatly outlining what the 'rules' of this film will 
		be. 
		We're 
		told bluntly that there were no traces of Jill being kidnapped and 
		therefore she must be lying and everything must exist in her head. 
		Despite the lack of subtlety, this actually makes a good portion of the 
		film intriguing because of the unreliability of the protagonist. It is 
		less conventional in a Hollywood thriller to have a relationship as 
		unstable as this with the central character. We're uncertain about 
		whether to sympathise with Jill since her behaviour is reckless and much 
		of her dialogue is lies as she tries to extract information from people. 
		But this is entirely undone by a pitiful finale, so straightforward and 
		routine that it makes the rest of the film's handiwork flat-out 
		redundant. This film was begging for a great twist and payoff but it 
		just doesn't deliver. What a wasted opportunity. 
		It is 
		also in this final quarter that we see the limitations of the 
		characterisation too because Seyfried isn't given the time or the 
		interaction to develop Jill into anything more than hysterical. 
		Considering the subject matter of this film I expected this to be far 
		more intense and more psychologically complex.